Suicide wrote:I like how people care more about the fact that a crappy snack cake is going to lose its company brand and not the 18,000 people who have lost their jobs to the stupidity and greed of their management.
I grow weary of this argument as well. The fact is the product met with competition and a decline in sales. That's ultimately why it's going out of business. All this arguing about greedy management vs. Union bosses is superfluous to the fact that people don't really bye Hostess as much anymore. Little Debbie and Krispy Kreme is more to "blame."
The fact is the Union and the CEO's are fighting over money they don't have because they aren't selling as well as they used to. Neither side wants to LET THE FUCK GO of structures that only worked when they were making much more money. Poorly handled ALL THE WAY AROUND.
Most of the blame lies with the CEO and his little circle of goons, in my opinion. Cutting pensions and pay is one thing, but then doing it while giving yourself a 300% raise? And doing this when your market share is declining rapidly to other companies? The entire company had been plagued with this kind of bad management for decades, filing for bankruptcy twice, and now it's a big shock that they're gone.
Oh no, No more Twinkies, Ho-hos, and other insipidly named junkfood!*
*Except in Canada and until those brands get picked up by another major company.
cresent34 wrote:AH-64D Longbow wrote:
Then they're silly and they don't have much going on in their lives.
You're starting to sound like the very people who would denigrate the stuff that goes on this board.
Would
you consider that silly?
Haha, oh wow. Nice conclusion, Senator McCarthy. Someone points out the inanity of mourning a corporate brand and the obscene amount of airtime it's gotten, so they must dislike the subject matter of the entire site! Dot. Dot. Dot.
All I'm sayin' is: Give war a chance.